|
Campaign
News Archive


Postcard
campaign: No EU referendum? No trust.
30 November 2009
In
response to David Cameron's recent statement setting out his party's
revised policy on the EU (see our blog
for details), the DM has this week published a new campaign postcard.
Addressed to the Conservative leader, the card highlights the contradictions
between Mr Cameron's stated principles, his words about 'trust' and
his actions in not only dropping his "cast iron guarantee"
of a vote on the Lisbon Treaty but refusing to hold any EU referendum
at all.
The campaign
is aimed at those who want to make clear to
Mr Cameron that, both in the interests of democracy and in his own electoral
interests, he must commit to delivering the referendum on Britain's
relationship with the EU that has long been promised.


DM
letter: Challenges for the Tories
6 October 2009
DM
campaign director Marc Glendening has the lead letter in today's Evening
Standard, responding to an article yesterday by Matthew d'Ancona
about the Conservatives and a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty.
Here's Marc's response in full:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
To
support his view that the Tories should drop their commitment to a
referendum on the Lisbon Treaty once it is ratified to avoid charges
of crankiness, Matthew d'Ancona concludes, "a referendum is a
fine thing but after 12 years ... a red box is finer"
(5 October).
But
here is the crux of the matter: EU directives already account for
a majority of the laws we must obey. If Lisbon goes through, 60 further
areas of decision-making will be subject to majority voting in Brussels
and EU leaders, meeting in secret, will be able to add unstipulated
new powers.
If
David Cameron becomes PM after the treaty has gone through and he
abandons his referendum pledge, to what extent will owning those ministerial
red boxes mean anything?
The
Tories must now decide whether they will play the political game by
the EU's rules, or risk outraging Brussels' political class and metropolitan
liberal opinion - but not lose any general election votes - by letting
the British people determine their own future.
It
should not be forgotten that without the UK's contribution to the
EU budget, the whole edifice would collapse: an important bargaining
chip for the next government.
Marc Glendening, The Democracy Movement

Not Liberal - Not Democrats
12 May 2009:
updated 30 November 2009
The
DM has launched a hard-hitting campaign to highlight the growing conflict
between the Liberal Democrats' claimed values and their enthusiasm for
handing ever more decision-making to the EU.
The
campaign started in the run up to the European Parliament elections
on 4th June but will continue right through until the next general
election, which is expected within months.
The
campaign follows a succession of affronts to democracy and civil
liberties committed by the Liberal Democrats, caused by their enthusiasm
for handing ever more decision-making to the EU. They amount to a stark
conflict between the party's claimed values and actions that can no
longer be allowed to pass unnoticed.
Not only did they vote to approve the highly illiberal and anti-democratic
Lisbon Treaty, but at every stage of the treaty's progress through Parliament
the Lib Dems did what it took - abstaining in the Commons and voting
against in the Lords - to prevent us being given the EU referendum they
promised us at the last general election.
In addition, their group in the European Parliament, led by Lib Dem
MEP Graham Watson, gave money to the 'Yes' side in the repeat Irish
referendum on the Lisbon Treaty, disrespecting the previous clear and
democratic 'No' vote.
That's
why our campaign has been called Not Liberal - Not Democrats.
Powers
the Lib Dems approved handing to the EU have resulted in:
- the EU Arrest
Warrant, which allows British citizens to be taken to face trial
in another EU member country without evidence of a crime having
to be presented in court - over-riding a fundamental legal safeguard
of individual liberty called Habeas Corpus;
- increased
"operational" powers for the growing EU police force Europol
which, unlike our national police, has immunity from criminal prosecution
(Statutory Instrument 1997 No.2973);
- the EU's
so-called Charter of Fundamental Rights, which includes a clause
(Article 52) allowing "limitations" of basic rights if
deemed in the "general interest" of the EU;
- powers
for the the EU to make laws in relation to
ID cards (Article 77-3);
- intrusive
internet and email monitoring such as the EU communications
data retention directive (2006/24/EC), which requires the storage
of data relating to every email we send and every website we visit.
Having
approved treaties handing the EU powers to make such laws, the Lib Dems
then posture in opposition when the inevitably authoritarian implications
become known. Yet once EU laws are made they cannot be blocked by national
Parliaments.
A giant mobile
poster bearing the campaign slogan (pictured above) has been deployed
to rove the marginal seats of the party's Westminster MPs who refused
to support the EU referendum they promised local voters.
The
roadshow will be accompanied by a targetted local leafleting and letter-writing
campaign by DM activists, and many other activities. Thousands
of campaign leaflets have already been distributed in Liverpool, Totnes,
Aylesbury, Welwyn Garden City, Bakewell, Stanford le Hope, Richmond-upon-Thames,
Folkestone, Tunbridge Wells, Norwich, Bournemouth, Maidenhead and Havant.

Luton
EU Referendum: The Results
21 October 2008
The
DM has scored a resounding victory in the Luton EU referendum.
After
a head-to-head battle with the European Movement, filmed for ITV's Tonight
programme, 63% voted 'No' to the Lisbon Treaty and a ground-breaking
54% voted to come out of the EU altogether.
The
programme documenting the event was shown on ITV1 and is typically watched
by between 3 and 6 million viewers.
The
result reflects major disatisfaction not just with the prospect of further
decision-making being passed to the EU but also with the extent of the
EU's current powers, its financial costs and the damaging effects of
its activities.
Click here
for the full results and more about the Luton referendum campaign
on the DM blog.
Click here
for more about our Break Free campaign.

The
Luton EU Referendum 2008
19 October 2008
ITV's
Tonight programme is staging an
EU referendum in Luton. The
edition of the programme about the referendum, EU Decide, will
be shown at 8pm, Monday 20 October.
Three
thousand Luton residents have been given the chance to vote 'Yes' or
'No' to the Lisbon Treaty, and whether to stay in or come out of the
EU.
See
a video clip of the launch of campaigning on ITV's Anglia
News.
The Democracy Movement is leading the 'No' side and supporting DM activists
on the campaign trail have been the Labour MP for Luton North, Kelvin
Hopkins, together with Thomas Rupp and Gayle Kinkead
from the European
Referendum Campaign.
Music producer and Pop Idol judge Pete Waterman has also
pledged his support for a 'No' vote, as has Bob Crow - RMT union
leader and chair of Trade
Unionists Against the EU Constitution.
We're
making the case that:
-
The
EU costs Luton. Britain pays far more to the EU than we get
back - £6 billion more every year, from 2007, equivalent to
£115 million every single week. This means that for
any money a Luton project receives from the EU, our government has
sent more than twice that amount to the EU in the first place.
It's ridiculous for the 'Yes' lobby to claim that paying ten
pounds to be given back less than a fiver is a 'good deal' we should
be grateful for.
The EU loses so much public money in fraud and mismanagement that
its auditors have refused to approve the "majority" of
its spending for what looks set to be 14 years in a row. Despite
this, the government recently agreed to increase the amount we hand
the EU by more than 60%.
Only a 'No' vote will send the strong message that the scandal of
this huge waste of public money has to stop. Support
greater investment in local public services, not waste on the EU.
Click here
to read more about the recent EU budget deal.
-
The
Lisbon Treaty is about centralising even more important decisions
in unelected Brussels institutions.
The treaty will mean ...
... more interference by the EU in how we manage big issues
like our energy supplies, National Health Service, criminal justice,
sport, transport and much more. EU interference typically places
heavy burdens on job-creating businesses and often has disastrous
side-effects. This has been seen over EU laws on postal services
and chemicals, action on high mobile phone charges for holiday-makers
causing call charge hikes for pay-as-you-go users, and in how the
EU-managed Common Fisheries Policy has decimated Europe's fishing
resources and is causing an environmental disaster.
...
a significant loss of influence over new EU laws due to increased
majority voting in the Council of Ministers and a 30% cut in our
ability to block EU laws we disagree with;
... the EU becoming more like a country in its own right
with the creation of a full-time 'President of Europe' and foreign
minister;
... more powers for the EU's embryonic police force Europol,
including to 'implement' operational action. Europol will retain
its immunity from criminal prosecution.
Yet the Lisbon Treaty will do nothing to reform the EU's failing
environmental policies, won't solve widespread waste and corruption
and doesn't make the EU more democratic.
Vote 'No' to say you want a better deal. Click here
to read more about the Lisbon Treaty and its "substantially
equivalent" predecessor - the EU Constitution.
-
There
is a better way. Trade and co-operation between European
countries is perfectly possible without having to pass ever more
decisions over our lives to remote EU institutions in Brussels.
Trade between countries existed long before the EU and the idea
that we would "say goodbye" to trade if the EU did not
exist is irresponsible scare-mongering.
Countries that have decided not to join the EU like Norway, Switzerland
and Iceland successfully trade and co-operate with those countries
that are EU members. More importantly, they can look beyond the
EU to greater opportunities worldwide. Britain needs to co-operate
with countries right around the world to solve common problems to
do with the environment, the economy and the fight against crime.
To do this successfully, we must first prevent ever more decision-making
being centralised in Brussels.
Click here
to read more about our Vision Europe.

MPs
reject a referendum on the
re-named EU Constitution Treaty
5
March 2008: updated 6 March 2008
A
majority of MPs voted yesterday evening against a referendum on the
re-named EU Constitution Treaty, despite having promised one at the
last election.
A
Conservative amendment for a referendum was defeated by a majority of
63 votes - 311 votes to 248. A second referendum amendment, put down
by rebel Labour MPs, was defeated by a majority of 64 votes.
Click
here
and enter your postcode on our dedicated ReferendumList website
to find out whether your MP voted for or against a referendum.
The
way that this treaty has been forced through Parliament lacks all legitimacy.
Government promises of a public vote, of 'line-by-line scrutiny' and
then of plentiful time to debate the treaty have all been broken. Large
swathes of vital powers the treaty gifts to remote EU institutions -
such as in defence, borders, future treaty revision and voting weights
- have been blocked from Parliamentary debate.
The
verdict of the cross-party House of Commons European Scrutiny Committee
that the Treaty is "substantially equivalent" to the
EU Constitution has also been completely ignored by the Government and
large numbers of MPs.
Most
serious of all, various polls show that the Government has utterly
failed to convince the public that the Lisbon Treaty is not the
EU Constitution re-named, yet have still refused to honour their clear
manifesto promise of a public vote.
In
the vote, the bulk of the Conservatives were supported by
29 Labour MPs, 15 Liberal Democrats, the Scottish and Welsh nationalist
parties and some independents. But this was not enough to overcome the
Government's majority.
A breakdown
of how those referendum rebels we had identified actually behaved during
the vote is as follows:
-
of the 29 Labour MPs we had recorded as supporting a referendum, three
did not vote and three voted against a referendum. One who
voted against actually supported a referendum amendment at the Second
Reading of the treaty Bill, and voted against its Second Reading,
so his switch is inexplicable. The remaining two who voted against
a referendum have evidently been writing misleading letters to their
constituents stating that they would support a public vote. Six additional
Labour MPs voted in support of a referendum.
-
of the 10 Lib Dem MPs we had recorded as supporting a referendum,
one
abstained and one did not vote. An additional seven voted in support
of a treaty referendum, totalling fifteen rebels against Nick Clegg's
policy.
The
Democracy Movement has responded to the vote by announcing the launch
of an 'Integrity Fund' to finance local campaigning in marginal constituencies
between now and the next general election, which could now be just
over a year away.
The
fund will target MPs of all parties who have voted against the referendum
they promised at the last election, and will finance the distribution
of thousands of leaflets, advertising and other campaign activities
in each target constituency. Funds have already been pledged to cover
more than a dozen constituencies.
Democracy Movement
director Stuart Coster said:
"Those
MPs who hoped this issue would go away once they had voted contrary
to their election promises have made a huge miscalculation.
"On
the basis of how MPs have voted on a Treaty referendum relative
to their election promises, between now and the next general election
we intend to ensure local voters know who they can and cannot
trust."
After
the remaining stages in the Commons, the Bill ratifying the Lisbon Treaty
will move to the House of Lords where there will be further debates
about a referendum.
If
the Lords pass a referendum amendment, the issue could be put to the
vote once again in the Commons.
The
matter of this treaty and broken promises of a referendum is very far
from over.

|